Archive | Court

“Cynical & deliberate” repossession practices earn Allan Hawkins’ companies fines & refund orders, commission seeks banning orders

2 finance companies headed by former Equiticorp boss Allan Hawkins – Budget Loans Ltd & Evolution Finance Ltd – were fined $720,000 in the Auckland District Court yesterday on 125 charges under the Fair Trading Act.Judge David Sharp also ordered the companies to pay $53,000 emotional harm reparations to 9 victims and $38,000 in refunds & credits to borrowers for repossession tactics he described as “cynical & deliberate”.

The Commerce Commission is seeking banning orders against Mr Hawkins, now 76, and his elder son, Wayne Hawkins, who was also a director at the relevant times, following this sentencing & the earlier conviction of Budget Loans on 34 charges under the Fair Trading Act in 2010.

6 years of misrepresenting repossession rights

The Commerce Commission’s general counsel for competition & consumer, Mary-Anne Borrowdale, set out the companies’ practices. She said that, over 6 years from 2009 until 2014, Budget Loans misrepresented its right to repossess goods and recover interest & costs from borrowers. It also misrepresented amounts borrowers were required to pay under attachment orders and made misrepresentations about the benefits of refinancing existing loans.

Budget bought the distressed loan books of National Finance 2000 Ltd in 2006 and Western Bay Finance Ltd in 2008, and has twice been convicted for its handling of them. After the company was fined in 2010, it undertook to return $500,000 in overcharged interest & fees to borrowers.

In 2016, Budget Loans was convicted on 106 charges but 19 charges were dismissed. The Commerce Commission successfully appealed the dismissal decision, and Budget Loans’ application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed in November 2017.

Mr Hawkins founded 1980s high-flier, the Equiticorp group. After its demise in the 1987 sharemarket collapse, he & other Equiticorp executives & an advisor were tried in relation to financing arrangements behind the group’s $166 million purchase of NZ Steel Ltd from the Government in 1987. Mr Hawkins was sentenced to 6 years’ jail in 1993.

After yesterday’s court hearing, Ms Borrowdale said: “The court acknowledged today that Budget Loans attempted to create cashflow by getting Western Bay & National Finance borrowers to pay as much as possible for as long as possible. It continually added costs & interest to loans and then repossessed essential goods from borrowers without notice when they couldn’t pay, regardless of whether it was legally entitled to do so.  “The costs of the repossession were, for the most part, higher than the value of the goods and sometimes Budget Loans simply threw repossessed goods away rather than selling them. It also obtained judgments against some borrowers, but continued to add interest & costs and demanded more from borrowers than the courts had awarded, and to misrepresent its right to repossess.

“Where loans were not secured, Budget Loans sought to convince some borrowers to sign new, secured loans by telling them that they would get a discount on their loan balance. However, the amount of the discounted loan was higher than the amount the borrower was actually required to pay.

“Budget Loans’ conduct & misrepresentations kept vulnerable borrowers in a cycle of debt & repossession. It knowingly engaged in illegal repossessions of essential items from people that it knew were already living in hardship. The financial & emotional distress caused by this conduct to borrowers & their families should not be underestimated.”

83 of the charges were for misrepresentations around repossession, including where there was no valid right to repossess a secured item of property, such as a vehicle or household goods, or where there was no outstanding loan balance to be paid.

“In some cases Budget Loans stripped houses almost bare. In other cases, it repossessed items that it should have known were of low value, and dumped them. Its own loan notes include such comments as ‘someone’s great idea to undertake an illegal repo’ and ‘debtor not to know we can’t repo’.”

29 charges were for adding interest & costs to a loan balance after repossession, when that is not allowed under the Credit Repossession Act.

Ms Borrowdale said: “One borrower declared herself bankrupt when told her loan had ballooned from about $9000 to $57,000. In fact she had less than $2500 to pay at that time. 10 charges were for misrepresentations about adding interest to loans, beyond amounts in attachment orders issued by the courts. One borrower’s loan balance was $8600 following an attachment order, but it was ‘recalculated’ to nearly $56,000.”

The final 3 charges were for misrepresentations about the benefits of refinancing with Budget Loans.

Allan Hawkins is now sole director of Budget Finance & its shareholder, Cynotech Securities Ltd. He & his wife, Laurel, own 99.98% of Cynotech.

He is also sole director of Evolution Finance. Its owner, the previously NZX-listed Cynotech Holdings Ltd, went into liquidation in 2013 after close funding supporters decided they’d no longer pay its overhead & infrastructure costs.

Earlier stories:
19 April 2017: Judge told to reconsider 19 dismissed charges against Hawkins loan companies
118 July 2016: Hawkins’ finance companies guilty on loan contract enforcement
 7 December 2014: Commission files criminal charges against 2 Allan Hawkins finance companies
9 November 2013: Commission tells Allan Hawkins’ finance companies to stop repossessions
31 July 2013: Hawkins goes to McDonald Vague for Cynotech liquidation
11 July 2013: Cynotech share trading halted after backers end support
15 June 2011: Cynotech loss increases as it clears decks
12 August 2010: NZX refuses Cynotech request for waiver
11 August 2010: Cynotech suspended
4 August 2010: Cynotech talks departure, NZX talks suspension
28 July 2010: “Welcome letter” from Hawkins’ Budget Loans to National Finance borrowers came with an illegal $15 fee
16 June 2010: Cynotech slips to loss
14 April 2010: Remaining Cynotech shares to move to NZAX
20 January 2010: Hawkins renews Cynotech privatisation bid
23 December 2009: Hawkins withdraws Cynotech bid after Takeovers Panel asks questions
21 April 2008: Cynotech doubles receivables book to $60 million-plus in 4 months
9 October 2006: Allan Hawkins buys National Finance (Payless Cars) loan book

Attribution: Commission release.

Continue Reading

Gubb jailed for fraud again

Former Auckland property consultant Stephen Rolf Gubb, 62, was sentenced to jail for fraud for a second time yesterday, this time for defrauding the Selwyn District Council in Canterbury over commission payments at its Izone business hub.

Mr Gubb admitted the charges in March and had been remanded in custody. In the Christchurch District Court yesterday, Judge David Saunders sentenced him to 2 years 9 months in jail.

For his first fraud conviction, in Auckland in 2003, he was sentenced to 4 years’ jail.

Serious Fraud Office director Julie Read said: “The sentence reflects the seriousness of offending which was not only deliberate, planned & long running, but a repetition of previous offending. Stephen Gubb defrauded a government body of $300,829, took advantage of his position and betrayed the trust his employer had placed in him. Mr Gubb was given an opportunity to rebuild his life following his previous fraud convictions but instead chose to offend again.”

As an employee of Hughes Developments Ltd, Mr Gubb sold land, leases & design-build packages for Izone in Rolleston, Christchurch.

The Serious Fraud Office charged Mr Gubb with fraudulently obtaining 13 commission payments of over $300,000 from the Selwyn District Council between March 2007 & July 2015. Nearly $150,000 of these payments were eventually transferred into a bank account controlled by Mr Gubb & his co-defendant, who has name suppression.

The Serious Fraud Office alleges that the co-defendant was complicit in obtaining the commission payments.

Mr Gubb also obtained $10,500 by submitting an invoice to the council for services that weren’t provided.

Mr Gubb’s previous prosecution by the Serious Fraud Office on fraud charges involved about $1.18 million. Victims then included the property consultancy where he was a director & shareholder, Grafton Group Ltd, and another company where he & his second wife, Helen, were shareholders, Beauford Properties Ltd.

Attribution: SFO release.

Continue Reading

Hawkins to pay $13.4 million to fix leaky new school

Justice Mathew Downs has ordered Hawkins Construction to pay $13.4 million + gst for remediation of a Botany high school which opened only in 2004.

Hawkins Construction North Island Ltd built the school’s buildings between 2003-09. The company’s name was changed to H Construction North Island Ltd in 2017, when Downer NZ Ltd bought the construction business from the McConnell family.

The claim was taken to the High Court by the Education Minister, Secretary for Education and the board of trustees of Botany Downs Secondary College.

Justice Downs said in his decision, out today: “The sum is not small, but Hawkins was paid approximately $28 million to build the school; pupils & teachers have not had the benefit of healthy code-compliant buildings for 8 years; and the award reflects the amount necessary to repair the school, not more.”

Judgment: Botany Downs Secondary College decision

  • More to come on this judgment once I’ve been through the detail.

Attribution: Judgment.

Continue Reading

First companies sentenced arising from steel mesh investigation

2 related companies, Timber King Ltd & NZ Steel Distributor Ltd, have been fined $400,950 for making false & misleading representations relating to their steel mesh products, which are used to strengthen buildings. NZ Steel Distributor imports steel from China and Timber King was the retailer.

They’re the first companies sentenced after Commerce Commission investigations into steel mesh sales, which began after the commission received a complaint from a Timber King customer in August 2015.

Auckland District Court judge Robert Ronayne heard the case in December and handed down his decision on Tuesday, fining Timber King on 5 charges and NZ Steel Distributor on 2 charges under the Fair Trading Act. The 2 companies pleaded guilty to making false, misleading & unsubstantiated representations relating to their TS10 steel mesh between June 2015 & February 2016.

From a starting point of $660,000, Judge Ronayne reduced the penalties by 10% for co-operation and 25% for early guilty pleas, and another 10% for claimed inability to pay a fine that big, although the judge was sceptical about the audit & accounting evidence provided to him.

Fake certificate

Judge Ronayne said the customer above bought 3 sheets of TS10 steel mesh from Timber King, noted the mesh had no tags and asked for a copy of the test certificate demonstrating compliance with the standard. After he received a photograph of a batch tag, the customer sought further verification of compliance. In reply, Timber King sent the customer a certificate on the letterhead of external building product testing laboratory SGS NZ Ltd.

Judge Ronayne: “As a result of further enquiries, it was revealed that the certificate was fake and had not been produced by SGS. SGS had not carried out testing of the mesh to determine compliance with the standard. Instead, the certificate had been created by an employee of Timber King using a genuine SGS test certificate that had been obtained in relation to testing of a different product and altering it so that it appeared to show that TS10 had been tested & found to comply.”

Jackie Liu is a director of both companies and, Judge Ronayne said, was for all intents & purposes the controlling mind of both companies. He owns 75% of the shares in Steel Distributor and effectively controls a 55% holding in Timber King through holding companies, Three Brothers Group Ltd & NZ Liu Family Trustees Ltd. He’s sole director of both.

Ringo Liu is also a director of both Timber King & Steel Distributor. He owns 25% of the shares in Steel Distributor and effectively controls a 45% holding in Timber King through Three Brothers.

This in a quake-prone country?

Judge Ronayne said: “It is quite obvious in New Zealand, given our history of earthquakes & the consequences of them, that there is a vital need for consumers to rely on representations as to standard compliance and, in particular, earthquake standard compliance.”

He concluded that the companies were “grossly negligent” in the steps they took to ensure that the product complied with the standard: “The creation of the fake certificate can only have been deliberately carried out in order to provide an additional false assurance of compliance with the standard.

“The use of non-compliant steel mesh, especially in the context of earthquake compliant mesh, has actual & potentially enormous consequences for consumers, for competitors and for the reputation of the building industry. Very strong specific & general deterrence is required in these circumstances.”

Mesh went into 32 homes

Timber King sold 2600 sheets of TS10 over a 9-month period, of which 614 are known to have failed both aspects of the standard and the others to have failed its testing requirements. Judge Ronayne said it appeared the 614 sheets went into the ground slabs for 31 homes and a suspended concrete floor of another home: “5 homes were considered to be high risk, 24 medium risk & 3 low risk. The 5 high risk homes were then referred to an engineer who considered one of them to be ‘of concern’. Obviously, this exercise has not been without cost.”

The judge added: “The misleading conduct appears to have been carried out with a focus to remain competitive in the market. It can therefore be assumed that this gave an unfair competitive advantage over compliant competitors.”

Background

The Commerce Commission has filed charges against a number of companies relating to false & misleading representations about 500E steel mesh. In 500E, the ‘E’ stands for earthquake, and the NZ Standard specifies strength & ductility (elasticity) requirements for steel reinforcing materials. The standard also specifies the procedures (ie, sampling & testing) that must be followed to comply including:

  • manufacturing methods that must be used by steel manufacturers
  • chemical, mechanical & dimensional requirements of mesh sampling & testing of each batch of mesh, and
  • identification & labelling of different grades of mesh.

To be sold in New Zealand as 500E grade steel mesh, the mesh must be produced in accordance with the requirements of the standard. If mesh is produced in any other way, it cannot be described as 500E mesh. The Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment is the building regulator, and sets & enforces the standards & Building Code. The commission can investigate misleading or deceptive claims about compliance with the standard.

Other inquiries

The commission has carried out a series of investigations into steel mesh following the complaint in August 2015. Following its investigations:

  • Fletcher Steel Ltd was issued with a warning
  • United Steel Ltd & Pacific Steel (NZ) Ltd were issued with compliance advice
  • Brilliance Steel Ltd pleaded guilty to 20 charges and will be sentenced on 25 May
  • Steel & Tube Holdings Ltd pleaded guilty to 24 charges and is awaiting sentencing
  • The commission filed 59 charges against Euro Corp Ltd in December 2017.

Links:
Timber King & NZ Steel Distributor judgment
Fletcher Steel warning
United Steel & Pacific Steel compliance advice

Earlier stories:
29 November 2017: Steel & Tube owns up to mesh label & testing guilty pleas
8 June 2017: Updated: Commission files 29 charges against Steel & Tube over mesh
8 April 2016: Steel & Tube undertakes dual mesh testing
5 March 2016: Suppliers recheck as commission questions steel mesh, ministry not worried

25 April 2016: Commission lifts ‘stop’ on Euro Corp steel mesh

Attribution: Judgment, commission release.

Continue Reading

Judge overturns year-old highrise consent next to heritage substation because of non-notification

High Court judge Rebecca Ellis has set aside a year-old resource consent for a 10-storey 39.5m building Equinox Capital Ltd proposes to build in central Wellington because the owners of a 2-storey heritage-listed former substation next door weren’t notified.

In her decision issued last Wednesday, Justice Ellis wrote: “In summary, I consider: (a) Sydney St Substation Ltd should have been given limited notification of Equinox’s resource consent application; (b) there was a material error in the 14 October 2016 decision not to publicly notify Equinox’s resource consent application; and (c) there were material errors in the 14 October 2016 decision granting Equinox’s resource consent application.

“There have been no matters raised which persuade me I should not exercise my discretion to grant relief here. I therefore make orders setting aside the notification decisions & the substantive resource consent decision, all of which are dated 14 October 2016.”

The dispute concerns buildings (heritage & proposed) a few doors from the courthouse, on what was Sydney St until 1993 and is now Kate Sheppard Place in Thorndon, a street noted for its “Elizabethan & Jacobean” architecture.

The category II heritage building is the old Sydney St substation at 19 Kate Sheppard Place, which has historical significance as one of the first substations constructed to distribute electricity in Wellington after the Mangahao hydro power station began operation in 1924.

Justice Ellis said it also had “some architectural significance due to what has been described as its ‘quirky mixture of architectural styles’”.

The lower of its 2 storeys originally housed the transformers & other substation equipment. The upper level has always been a home. “That unusual & experimental combination of utilitarian & residential design is regarded as adding to its architectural interest. A heritage covenant was placed on the building in 2011.”

In 2013 the Government sold the substation building to Sydney St Substation Ltd, owned by Trevor & Jillian Lord. They renovated & strengthened the building to some acclaim, with the assistance of a Wellington City Council grant. The entirety of the building is now used for residential purposes.

Justice Ellis concluded: “There can be no real doubt that the substation’s heritage value was highly influential in the decision to purchase it, and to renovate it at some expense. To suggest that an adverse effect on the substation’s heritage value does not, equally, adversely affect its owner seems unattractive. So if there is a minor adverse effect on the heritage value of the building there is a minor adverse effect on Sydney St Substation Ltd.

“Even if there is some flaw in that logic, there remains the further & more substantive (“anticipated development model”) issue. The views I have expressed about that strongly support the conclusion that the adverse effects on the owner of the substation (in terms of the matters of which discretion is restricted under rule 13.3.4, namely design, external appearance, siting & placement of building mass) have been understated and are at least minor.

“On any of the above analyses, therefore, Sydney St Substation Ltd was an affected person and should have received limited notification of Equinox’s resource consent application.”

In contrast with the judge’s view, the council notification said: “There are no affected persons in respect of this application (sections 95B/95E). It is noted that neighbours have registered an interest in works occurring on the subject site. Neighbour interest does not deem them to be affected parties under the tests of the act or qualify as special circumstances under the act in this case.”

The judge said most other buildings in the vicinity were multi-level office blocks “of limited street appeal”. The Lords sought judicial review of Wellington City Council’s approval of resource consent “authorising the construction of another such building immediately adjacent to the substation, on a site which is presently a carpark. In short, Sydney St Substation Ltd says that the council was wrong to grant the consent and also wrong to even consider it on a non-notified basis. They say that the substation will be significantly adversely affected by the proposed construction.”

Equinox (Chong Du Cheng & Kerry Knight) has plans for 63 apartments, a 39-room hotel with ground-floor lobby and ground-floor commercial space with a total floor area of 32,422m².

An important factor in the judge’s consideration was that the proposed building would exceed the height limit of 35.4m in the “low city” area, set out in the district plan.

According to the district plan guidelines, “Where a new development adjoins a heritage building that is 4 storeys or less, its height should be not more than one storey above the heritage building, over an area extending approximately 5-8m along & back from the street frontage at the common boundary with the heritage building”.

Link: Substation judgment

Attribution: Judgment.

Continue Reading

Lawyer gets home detention for Celestion project finance deception

Lawyer Timothy Upton Slack (55) was sentenced to 10 months’ home detention today for his role in getting finance for the Celestion apartments hotel project in 2008.

The development by Emily Projects Ltd (Leonard Ross) was close to not proceeding in the early days after the global financial crisis had started to impact, for lack of sales.

ANZ Bank NZ Ltd agreed to advance $41 million under an agreement signed in December 2008, provided Emily Projects had qualified presales on 80 of the proposed 127 apartments, all buyers unrelated to the developer & with cash deposits.

In the Auckland High Court today, Justice Kit Toogood said Mr Slack gave the bank several undertakings & personal assurances “that you knew were blatant lies”.

The judge said: “Although you said there was minimum risk to the bank, it was for the bank to decide that…. Deliberate & planned deception increases your culpability.” He said the bank was likely to reconsider its lending procedures.

Mr Slack made false representations that the preconditions had been satisfied. In fact, Justice Toogood said, “Emily Projects had in fact achieved few if any of those presales. The letters of acknowledgment were entirely false. In fact no deposits had been paid and no cash deposits were held.”

The judge said Mr Slack “had no idea the deposits & letters of acknowledgment were false”, but he went on to provide several false undertakings that his law firm held deposit funds in its account. The firm charged Emily Projects $488,000 in fees for its work.

The bank also didn’t lose out. The project, between Emily Place & the foot of Anzac Avenue in the Auckland cbd, was completed, the bank collected interest on its loan and the development finance was paid back.

Mr Slack pleaded guilty on 1 September to one representative Crimes Act charge of obtaining by deception. Justice Toogood said the maximum jail term was 7 years, but the agreed starting point in setting penalty was 4 years’ jail.

He told Mr Slack: “You were disciplined by the Law Society in 2005 for another misdemeanour. That disqualifies you from any discount for good character.”

However, the judge discounted the prospective jail term by 16% for remorse & future consequences and took the discount to 25% for an early guilty plea, plus 20% for the “moderate” degree of support he gave the Serious Fraud Office, which prosecuted.

Justice Toogood told Mr Slack: “Your complicity was essential to the deception [but] you did not devise the fraud scheme yourself.”

The judge also said Mr Slack’s humiliation & loss of income – and there is doubt that he will retain his certificate to practise as a lawyer – added to the discount, reducing the potential jail term to 22 months: “That means you are eligible for home detention.”

Justice Toogood did not explain how a longer jail term translated into a shorter period of home detention, but commented: “I regard your reactions to your disgrace that you have real insight into your offending & its causes and pose no risk of reoffending…. Imprisoning you would serve no useful purpose.”

Mr Slack was adjudicated bankrupt in 2013 and automatically discharged in April 2016.

The other 3 defendants in this case – property developer Leonard John Ross and 2 men who worked for him, company director Michael James Wehipeihana and self-employed consultant Vaughn Stephen Foster – will face trial on 5 June 2018.

Justice Toogood told Mr Slack: “I have made no findings at all about the guilt or innocence of your codefendants.”

Earlier stories:
3 September 2017: Celestion finance deal lawyer pleads guilty
12 April 2017: Remand on Celestion development fraud allegations
17 February 2017: SFO alleges fraud in Celestion development loan deal
8 May 2009: Ross’ Emily Projects starts work on ex-Blue Chip site

Attribution: Court sentencing.

Continue Reading

Celestion finance deal lawyer pleads guilty

The lawyer accused of serious fraud relating to finance for development of the Waldorf Celestion apartments hotel in 2009 pleaded guilty in the Auckland High Court on Friday to one Crimes Act charge of obtaining by deception.

Timothy Upton Slack (55) was one of 4 men charged by the Serious Fraud Office with making false statements in order to obtain a credit facility from the ANZ Bank NZ Ltd to allow Emily Projects Ltd to develop the Celestion between Anzac Avenue & Emily Place in Auckland.

The Serious Fraud Office has alleged that a loan facility of about $40 million was obtained.

Mr Slack’s name suppression was lifted, but non-publication orders relating to third parties remain in place. He faces up to 3 years’ jail. Mr Slack was adjudicated bankrupt in 2013 and automatically discharged in April 2016.

The other 3 defendants – property developer Leonard John Ross, company director Michael James Wehipeihana and self-employed consultant Vaughn Stephen Foster – will face trial on 5 June 2018.

Earlier stories:
12 April 2017: Remand on Celestion development fraud allegations
17 February 2017: SFO alleges fraud in Celestion development loan deal
9 October 2009: Apartments at centre of Blue Chip case go on market
8 May 2009: Ross’ Emily Projects starts work on ex-Blue Chip site

Attribution: SFO release, insolvency register.

Continue Reading

Ratepayers get small court victory in scrap over Mangawhai sewer scheme levies

High Court judge Ailsa Duffy has brought to an end an episode in the scrap over the secretively funded & heavily over cost Mangawhai Ecocare sewerage scheme.

The Mangawhai Ratepayers’ & Residents’ Association & its chair, Bruce Rogan, fought the imposition of rates to pay for the sewerage system after its cost blowout was exposed – the district council secretly borrowed $58 million for its capital cost – resulting in a Validation Act being passed as the association was heading to court for a judicial review.

In 2014, Justice Paul Heath found the Validation Act passed to make those rates lawful did just that – made them lawful.

Some ratepayers, led by Mr Rogan, refused to pay Kaipara District Council rates, and refused to pay Northland Regional Council rates when they discovered the regional council had no authority to hire the district council to collect them.

Justice Duffy found in an interim judgment that these regional council rates were unlawful. In a second judgment on that case yesterday, she quashed the regional council’s rates for the rating years 2011-12 to 2015-16 and also set aside the penalties imposed for non-payment.

However, she said the ratepayers’ association & Mr Rogan hadn’t sought reimbursement in their claim and she made no order directing the regional council to refund the relevant rates & penalties.

Attribution: Judgment.

Continue Reading

Top court rejects golfcourse levy on Pauanui Lakes subdivision section owner

Pauanui Lakes homeowner Hartley Vincent has defeated the final attempt, in the Supreme Court, to make him pay levies to the golf club which runs the Coromandel development’s golfcourse.

Gary MacDougall (Pauanui Lake Resort Ltd) began his ambitious $34 million resort project in 1998 — 153 residential sections, mostly round the edge of an 18-hole golfcourse, and a 60-room lodge on a 100ha Duck Creek property that runs along a valley 4km from Hoppers’ Pauanui coastal development, but that original development company went into receivership on 1 August 2001.

Other developers took on the project but also collapsed in 2009 as the global financial crisis took hold.

Mr Vincent, co-owner of Harpers Fashions Ltd whose family trust owns lot 75 of the residential subdivision developed around the course, and current golfcourse business owners & managers Lakes International Golf Management Ltd & The Lakes International Golf Course Ltd squared off before Associate Judge Hannah Sargisson in 2 separate summary judgment cases in the High Court in 2013, for a nil decision.

The case then went to trial in the High Court before Justice Paul Heath, who found the golfcourse businesses were entitled to levy Mr Vincent for fees. Justice Heath found that Lakes International Golf Management was entitled to enforce the covenant originally to have been held by an incorporated society, which was never formed, and that Mr Vincent was required as owner of a subdivision lot to join the golf club.

Mr Vincent appealed to the Court of Appeal, which supported his case in 2014.

The Court of Appeal said: “In our view, the scheme of the covenant and the wording of the definition of ‘golf club’ are clear and permit of only one meaning. The obligations were imposed in relation to a golf club that was to be incorporated as an incorporated society to provide for playing rights on the golf course.”

However, in the Supreme Court decision written by Justice Sir Willie Young & issued on Wednesday, the country’s highest court said it was satisfied “that there is no occasion for us to reach a concluded view in respect of them [arguments over whether a society as postulated would meet what was envisaged by the covenant]. This is because the case must be determined by reference to what has, and not what might have, happened.

“What has happened is that the golf club as established is not of the kind stipulated in the covenant. That it might have been no less onerous for Mr Vincent to join a golf club which was an incorporated society is of no moment as he cannot be compelled to do something which is different from what he agreed.”

The 5 members of the Supreme Court who heard the case in March were Chief Justice Dame Sian Elias and Justices Sir Willie Young, Susan Glazebrook, Mark OʼRegan & Ellen France.

Link: Supreme Court decision

Earlier story:
U: The names behind the action, the week to 24 April 2011, part 1, Richard & Susan Herbert’s insolvency proposals go to joint hearing

Attribution: Supreme Court decision.

Continue Reading

3 ex-Masala restaurants nearly make $8 million forfeiture order price tag at auction

3 restaurants in the former Masala chain were sold for $7.875 million at Bayleys’ auction yesterday, just short of a forfeiture order made in February.

Image above: Dining room of the former Masala restaurant in Mt Eden.

A Glen Eden shop with the Mad Butcher as tenant and a Dilworth apartment at the foot of Queen St were also sold under the hammer.

The restaurants, owned by JKK Holdings Ltd (Supinder Singh & Daisy Kaur) were taken to auction by the Official Assignee under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act after Justice Rebecca Edwards agreed in the High Court to an $8 million assets forfeiture order between the Commissioner of Police and 8 companies & 2 individuals associated with the Masala restaurant chain.

Justice Edwards said in her decision approving the settlement: “The settlement sum of $8 million represents almost all of the unlawful benefit said to have been derived from the tax evasion offending. The settlement sum is expected to be met in full through the sale of restrained properties.”

The 2 individuals, Joti Jain & Rajwinder Singh Grewal, were sentenced in 2015 to home detention and ordered to pay reparations on a long list of immigration & exploitation charges.

In March, Ms Jain was reported to have left New Zealand ahead of an appeal against being deported, but she was in the auctionroom yesterday.

All 3 restaurants in Mt Eden, Stanmore Bay & Birkenhead attracted multiple bidders. The properties were marketed for sale on an “as is where is” basis and subject to occupancy.

Apartments

CBD

Queen St

Dilworth, 22 Queen St, unit 5L:
Features: one bedroom, high stud
Outcome: sold for $530,000
Agents: Julie Prince & Diane Jackson

Commercial

Isthmus west

Mt Eden

510 Mt Eden Rd:
Features: 554m² section, 200m² restaurant in converted villa at corner of Disraeli St in Mt Eden village, additional 206m² downstairs area gives potential to split risk
Outcome: sold for $3.61 million on “as is where is” basis, subject to occupancy
Agents: Scott Kirk, Adam Curtis, John Algie

North-east

Birkenhead

188-192 Hinemoa St:
Features: 835m² site, development potential, 280m² restaurant in converted villa, wraparound covered deck, vacant office area below restaurant previously used as accommodation
Outcome: sold for $2.535 million on “as is where is” basis, subject to occupancy
Agents: Adam Curtis, John Algie & Damian Stephen

Stanmore Bay

195 Brightside Rd:
Features: 1783m² site, 276m² restaurant
Outcome: sold for $1.73 million on “as is where is” basis, subject to occupancy
Agents: Jeremy Milton, John Algie & Adam Curtis

North-west

Glen Eden

5 Oates Rd, unit 5:
Features: 292m² corner unit in block of 13 shops, dual access, split internally between retail, office storage, meat processing & cool storage, opportunity to split or occupy the tenancy
Rent: $92,040/year net + gst from established tenant, the Mad Butcher
Outcome: sold for $1.375 million at a 6.7% yield
Agents: Adam Curtis, Adam Watton & Oscar Kuang

Earlier story:
28 February 2017: $8 million Masala assets forfeiture agreed

Attribution: Auction.

Continue Reading
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux